Note from Anson
This week, a French regulator revealed that 30% of crypto companies aren't even responding to licensing requirements. Meanwhile, 48 countries quietly started sharing your users' transaction data with tax authorities.
The rules aren't coming. They're here. This issue: what that means for you, and how to make sure you're not in that 30%.

Welcome to Scale with Trust
$19.6 billion.
That's how much US regulators collected in crypto enforcement in 2025. SEC and CFTC combined. The highest on record.
If you're building in crypto or fintech, that number is your new reality.
But here's what should really get your attention: it's not just the US anymore.
This week:
A French regulator revealed that 30% of crypto companies simply aren't responding to licensing requirements
48 countries activated new tax reporting rules. Exchanges now report your users' data directly to authorities
Even the US Senate can't agree on crypto legislation. Their markup got delayed again
The pattern is clear. Regulators worldwide are done waiting.
Here's what that means for you.
The rules aren't coming. They're here. This issue: what that means for you, and how to make sure you're not in that 30%.

30% Aren't Even Picking Up the Phone
Last week, a French financial regulator shared a troubling stat.
Of the 90 crypto companies operating in France without a MiCA license, 30% haven't responded to the regulator's communications at all. Not "working on it." Not "applied and waiting." Just... silent.
This isn't just a France problem. It's a preview of what happens everywhere when regulation arrives and you're not ready.
The breakdown:
30% have applied for a license (doing it right)
40% said they're not seeking one (exiting the market)
30% haven't responded at all (the danger zone)
That last group? They're operating on borrowed time. France's transition period ends in June. After that: shut down, blocked from EU users, potential penalties.
The lesson for every founder:
When a regulator reaches out, you respond. Within days, not weeks. "We're looking into it" is acceptable. Silence is not.
This pattern will repeat in every jurisdiction that gets serious about crypto regulation. The question is whether you'll be in the 30% who responded, or the 30% who didn't.

The Regulatory Pulse
Global Tax Reporting (48 Countries): On January 1, the UK and 47 other countries activated the OECD's Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework. Exchanges now collect and report user transaction data, tax residency, and identification directly to tax authorities. Automatic international sharing begins in 2027. The US joins in 2028.
US Senate: The crypto market structure bill markup was scheduled for January 15, then delayed. Again. The legislation would clarify SEC vs CFTC jurisdiction, but disagreements on DeFi liability and stablecoin rules persist. Even with a pro-crypto administration, getting this right is hard.
Japan: Signaling a shift toward crypto-friendly regulation, with possible reclassification that could unlock institutional investment. One to watch.

Stat of the Week: $19.6 Billion
That's US enforcement alone. In one year.
Agency | 2025 Total | Notes |
|---|---|---|
SEC | $2.6 billion | 30+ crypto actions, highest on record |
CFTC | $17 billion | Digital assets = ~50% of enforcement docket |
Combined | $19.6 billion |
The CFTC number is staggering. Digital assets now make up nearly half their entire enforcement workload.
This isn't a crackdown that ends. It's a new operating cost.
As one analysis put it: "These enforcement actions don't mark the end of crypto's disruptive potential. They mark the end of its regulatory adolescence."
Founder Reality Check: Are You in the 30%?
Ask yourself:
If a regulator emailed you today, could you respond substantively within a week? (30% of French companies couldn't.)
Do you know which licenses you actually need in your top 3 markets? Not "we're looking into it." Actually know.
Is compliance a line item in your budget? Or still "something we'll figure out when we scale"?
Do you have someone (even part-time) whose job includes regulatory relationships?
Can you explain your compliance strategy to investors in one paragraph? Because they're asking.
If you hesitated on any of these, you have work to do.
The founders who treat compliance as a competitive advantage are the ones who'll still be operating in 2027. The ones treating it as "Phase 2" are finding out Phase 2 doesn't exist anymore.

The Bottom Line
$19.6 billion in enforcement. 30% of companies not responding to regulators. 48 countries now sharing tax data.
The message is clear: the grace period is over.
This week's action items:
Respond to everything. If a regulator, licensing body, or compliance inquiry lands in your inbox, respond within 48 hours. Even if it's just "received, we'll have a full response by [date]."
Know your exposure. List every jurisdiction where you have users. Do you know the licensing requirements in each?
Budget for it. If compliance isn't a line item, it's not real.
The founders who figure this out now will have a significant advantage. The ones who don't will join that 30%.
Don't be in the 30%.

Not sure if you're in the 30%?
Our Inspection Drill benchmarks your compliance readiness in 30 days. One-time engagement. Clear gaps identified. Action plan delivered.
-> See how it works: azentiqnexus.com/services
Or reply with what you're building - I read everything.
Scale smart.
Anson Zeall, Founder of Azentiq Nexus Consulting LLP
P.S. Know a founder who's still treating compliance as "Phase 2"? Forward this. The 30% didn't think they needed help either.
